The firm's defense attorney tries to distinguish how Andy got AIDS (sexual activity) from how other characters contracted it (blood transfusions). However, Andy is arguing that his firing was unlawful discrimination, for which he has legal precedent. The firm is arguing it wasn't about AIDS at all. This line of argument does nothing to prove that it wasn't AIDS discrimination; in fact it helps to make the plaintiff's case.
Scritto da il
05/03/2025 alle ore 07:29
Consiglia
Voto
Nessun dato in archivio
Commenti
Nessun dato in archivio
